Skip to content

Sellafield - Inspection ID: 53047

Executive summary

Date(s) of inspection: June 2024

Aim of inspection

In accordance with the Office for Nuclear Regulation’s (ONR’s) Sellafield Strategy, each year ONR performs a series of planned inspections to seek assurance of compliance against selected licence conditions, targeted at those facilities with significant importance to nuclear safety. One such inspection was undertaken at    Special Nuclear Materials Value Stream (SNM) facilities  North  within the Sellafield site in West Cumbria  to sample evidence of implementation of Sellafield Limited's arrangements for compliance with Licence Condition (LC) 11 (Emergency arrangements)  in order to inform a regulatory judgement regarding the licensee’s compliance with its legal duties under the nuclear site licence.

Subject(s) of inspection

  • LC11 - Emergency arrangements - Rating: Green

Key findings, inspector's opinions and reasons for judgement made

The inspection was undertaken on  12 June 2024 by the Special Nuclear Materials (SNM) site inspector. 
 
The inspection involved a planning phase and a site visit, which included  discussions with relevant Sellafield Limited personnel, review of records,  sampling   of   information contained within electronic databases, other documentation and an inspection of the  Access Control Points (ACP) and  Incident Control Centre (ICC).
 
From a mixture of sampling records, interviewing Sellafield Limited personnel and facility visits, I concluded the following:
 
  • No significant matters were identified that required immediate regulatory attention.
  • I saw evidence that SNM North  have adequate annual and five-year drills and exercise schedules  for all Emergency Operating Instructions (EOIs).
  • SNM North were  effectively planning and undertaking drills and exercises in line with the corporate arrangements.
  • I saw evidence that adequate Cross Plant Resource Agreements (CPRA) are in place and SNM North appeared to adequately manage the CPRA relevant to the Magnox Reprocessing shift change. 
  • SNM North  provided me with assurance that  learning from actual events as well as from the drills and exercises has been appropriately captured.
  • I saw evidence  that those personnel who delivered  emergency duties on the day of the inspection   were  suitably trained to undertake their emergency duty team roles.
  • Adequate Access Control Points (ACP) and Incident Control Centre (ICC) were in place.
 
I identified a number of minor shortfalls and I provided regulatory advice. Sellafield Limited proactively raised a Condition Report and ATLAS actions to capture these minor shortfalls. I will follow these up as part of routine  interactions. 

Conclusion

On the basis of evidence sampled and the interactions that I held with Sellafield Limited staff, at the time of the inspection, I judge that Sellafield Limited has    largely    implemented its corporate arrangements for compliance with LC11 (emergency arrangements) at SNM North and South.  Upon consideration of the ONR guidance on inspection ratings, I judge that a rating of green (no formal action) is appropriate.